London would need 1,330 more Hyde parks filled with trees to combat its annual CO2 emissions

With human activities releasing more carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere than natural processes can remove, new analysis has shed light on the number of extra trees that cities around the world would need to neutralise their carbon footprint.

Picterra, a leading cloud-native geospatial AI platform, has used its technology to visualise tree coverage in over 25 of the world’s most iconic cities, before analysing external data to estimate their CO2 emissions and the number of trees and the amount of space that it estimates would be required to offset the equivalent carbon.

London would have to make room for another 1,330 Hyde Parks filled with trees to neutralise its carbon footprint.

Meanwhile, New York, home to one of the most visited city parks worldwide, came fifth in the rankings, needing the equivalent of 1,304 Central Parks to counteract its emissions.

Omitting an estimated 320,241,244 tonnes of CO2 every year, Tokyo would have to plant over 2 billion (2,001,507,775) trees, which would require a total of 3,091,141 acres of land, accounting for tree planting density guidelines.

On the opposite end of the scale, Rotterdam demanded the fewest trees to neutralise its approximate 7,930,313 tonnes of emissions, with 49,564,459 trees and 76,548 acres required.

Renowned for its skyscrapers and modern architecture, Dubai came in tenth place overall, yet fared the worst for the number of trees required per person to offset its CO2 levels, at an estimated 130.5 trees for each resident.

A full list of findings can be found in the below league table, ranked from the cities in need of the most trees to the fewest. 

City

Total City CO2 (tonnes)

No. of Trees to Neutralise City CO2

No. of Acres Required to Neutralise Total CO2

No. of Trees Required Per Person (according to 2022 population figures)

Tokyo

320,241,244

2,001,507,775

3,091,141.1

51.7

Beijing

192,630,994

1,203,943,712

1,859,378.2

53.1

Moscow

168,775,978

1,054,849,860

1,629,116.7

79.9

Seoul

122,453,481

765,334,255

1,181,987

73.6

New York

113,904,467

711,902,920

1,099,467.3

86.6

Toronto

96,981,201

606,132,505

936,114.8

91.3

Mexico City

79,321,934

495,762,085

765,658.1

21.4

Sydney

77,427,917

483,924,483

747,376

90.7

Montreal

65,567,121

409,794,505

632,889.2

91.3

Dubai

65,414,930

408,843,314

631,420.2

130.5

New Delhi

62,917,900

393,236,876

607317.5

11.5

Buenos Aires

61,496,948

384,355,922

593,601.7

23.8

Cairo

55,458,003

346,612,516

535,310.5

15.0

Los Angeles

54,431,363

340,196,021

525,400.9

86.6

Singapore

53,815,602

336,347,513

519,457.2

53.1

Paris

53,352,174

333,451,090

514,984.0

28.6

London

48,240,550

301,503,438

465,643.8

30.0

Chicago

37,665,657

235,410,356

363,569.2

86.6

Cape Town

33,009,390

206,308,688

318,624.4

40.5

Hong Kong

32,583,556

203,647,227

314,514.1

25.4

Barcelona

31,166,711

194,791,943

300,837.9

32.9

Rio de Janeiro

29,514,598

184,466,238

284,890.8

12.9

Berlin

29,163,334

182,270,838

281,500.2

49.0

Milan

17,287,044

108,044,023

166,863.9

32.9

Lisbon

12,212,182

76,326,135

117,878.6

24.4

Rotterdam

7,930,313

49,564,459

76,547.7

46.7

Using its geospatial AI software, Picterra looked at the current state of forestry in each city, giving a realistic picture of how each city fares.

Picterra enables its users to detect any objects, in this case, trees, faster than ever before by managing the entire geospatial machine learning pipeline with its cloud-native platform.

Commenting on the findings, Frank de Morsier, chief operating officer at Picterra, said:

“We aim to make a positive and meaningful impact on our planet and environment. That’s why we have used our geospatial AI tool to visualise the number of trees there currently are in each city’s centre, giving a realistic view of the state of forestation in the cityscapes we know so well, with stark differences evident.

‘While the analysis of existing data alongside these visualisations is simply an estimate of how many trees and acres are needed to neutralise carbon emissions, it serves to illuminate how deep of an issue current CO2 levels are.

“Planting trees remains one of the most effective ways to temper carbon emissions – though, as this analysis shows, this would need to be on an extreme scale to make progress towards neutrality.”

Latest articles

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

spot_imgspot_img